Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kumar who wrote (115311)	5/22/2005 5:55:31 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 793952

<- Those bounds are supposedly violated with publications of photos that denigrate a POW.> Unlike Marg Simpson's nude painting of Mr Burns, in which she painted his masculinity as being a wizened shadow of real manhood, which was denigrating, [not that we saw the actual detail], the photo of Saddam, albeit partly clothed, showed a real man and Jockey undies company will have been thrilled. He is obviously a real man, unless the photo was digitally altered to enlarge his genitalia. I don't think the photo denigrates him. On the contrary, I think it perfectly reasonable to show some photos to show his condition. In fact, there should be some up to date photos to show that he is not being Abu Ghraibed. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next