SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (10665)5/22/2005 4:56:46 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
The left is completely unhinged. And the moonbat insanity starts right at the top.

Howard Dean On Meet The Press

By Rob on Default

Trey Jackson has video up of Howard Dean on Meet The Press.

Here’s a quote:

<<<

“The insinuation that the President continues to make to this day that Osama Bin Laden had something to do with supporting the terrorist who attacked the United States - that is false.”
>>>

This is the first time I’ve ever heard Dean claim that bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11. I’ve always thought that it was pretty clear to just about everybody that Osama was the ringleader of that operation.

After watching the video, though, I’m pretty sure that Dean meant to say Saddam Hussein instead of Osama bin Laden. He repeated Osama’s name a couple of times without correcting himself, but in the context of what he was saying I’m pretty sure he meant Saddam.

Which, even if that is true, Dean is still full of it.

Nobody is claiming that Saddam Hussein was responsible in any way for the attacks on 9/11.

Bush is certainly not making that claim “up until this day” as Dean asserts.

Rather, Saddam’s regime was targeted as one that supported terror in general, which is a big difference.

Another interesting part is where Dean talks about the weapons of mass destruction. He says that the WMD’s claim was “not true.” Russert counters by telling Dean that he himself said there were WMD’s in Iraq. Dean immediately tries to spin it by saying, “I said I wasn’t sure” and then following it up with “I said I thought there probably were.”

If Dean thought there probably were WMD’s in Iraq, where does he get off criticizing the President for thinking the same thing?

sayanythingblog.com

treyjackson.typepad.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News