SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (115496)5/22/2005 8:00:22 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 793843
 
you immediately make it about gay rights

I didn't make it about gay rights. Clarence Thomas did. He said there was no right to engage in sodomy, which Tim framed as gay rights. I said it wasn't about gay rights but about the right to privacy in one's castle.

The distinction between the liberal and libertarian positions, seems to me, is that liberals are concerned with the perceived affirmative rights of humanity such as the right to their choice of sexual activity, the right to health care, the right to sustenance, shelter, education, etc. Libertarians focus on the right to be left in peace.

So, would what I wrote be OK if I changed it as follows?

Karen: Don't think so. Yes, liberals do tend to be supporters of affirmative human rights, such as sexual engagement with a partner of the same sex, but this wasn't about an affirmative right. In my mind it was about the right to be left alone, the libertarian perspective. Same net effect so I would think liberals and libertarians would support this decision equally.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext