SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (115617)5/23/2005 12:39:34 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 793914
 
Found the quote I was looking for, Selden and Blackstone on the difference between a court of law and a court of equity. In a court of equity, the chancellor rules according to his conscience, not according to the law, as in a court of law.

“For law, we have a measure, and know what to trust to: equity is according to the conscience of him that is chancellor; and as that is larger or narrower, so is equity. 'Tis all one, as if they should make the standard for the measure a chancellor's foot. What an uncertain measure would this be! One chancellor has a long foot, another a short foot, a third an indifferent foot. It is the same thing with the chancellor's conscience."

Which is why judges in courts of law are supposed to rule according to law, not to their personal moral creed or personal preferences.

It's the job of the people, acting through their legislatures, to make law. Not judges.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext