SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonder who wrote (35008)5/25/2005 11:11:01 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
"Are you saying that a court martial is a war crimes trial?"

Of course not, though it may be in some cases. You see, "court martial" has a much broader meaning than "war crimes trial." For example, one can be tried by court martial for petty or serious crimes, committed during peace or war, in a war zone or not (provided, of course, that the accused is subject to the UCMJ and, therefore, the jurisdiction of military courts). A "war crimes trial" is a much more specific kind of trial, as its name implies.

If one is charged with abusing a suspected terrorist (to the point of death, let's say), is that a "war crime" or is it simply murder/manslaughter?

I'm not sure it is a "war crime" because the meaning of that term is far from clear and is often applied (or not) depending on the politics of the speaker.

But IF it is, is the trial only a "war crime trial" if held at the ICC and not in a US court? Why?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext