SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (234728)5/26/2005 1:33:02 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1578945
 
Thanks for that. Reading it after reading your post just reinforces what I already know.

Nor was there a hanging chad issue.
Nope: Just an issue of people altering ballots. It's the same thing.

A majority of WA state were in favor of having the election redone. A majority did not want a new election.
Between NRO and you, I will take their statement of poll results over your opinion on this. Thanks for pointing out that you only believe polls that support your pro Democrat opinions.

LOL.

With the voting miscounts discovered by the GOP, Rossi would have won. Nonsense! Using the GOP's own standards, the Seattle Times who endorsed Rossi in the race concluded that Rossi would not have won any which way the votes were counted.
If you just pitch the illegal felon votes Rossi would have won without any other errors. Actually any one of the errors would have resulted in Rossi winning.

LOL. I notice you are long on accusations like your WA GOP cronies but short on proof. Fortunately, in court, they will have to prove their allegations.

There was voter fraud. Right! Not once has there been any indication of voter fraud. Its a recurring fantasy of Vance, the head of the state's GOP....and that's all it is, his fantasy.

It is illegal to change, alter or adulterate ballots.

LOL. Who altered ballots and when did they do it?

I suspect fraud was not the proper word. Criminal conspiracy would probably be more appropriate. The author appears to have erred on the lenient choice of words.

You are really funny. If the judge rules in favor of the Dems will you claim a corrupted, activist judge bought off by the Dems? How much you want to bet that's what your comrades will say?

You all are like the people who are convinced that everyone else is responsible for their screw ups.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News