Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (20168)	5/26/2005 6:08:30 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 28931

"The specific stages that you cited "fish and reptile" are precisely those that there is no discernible evidence for." You are wrong! You can quote people from 1967 with a bias! But you are STILL WRONG! NOBODY is preaching the literal truth of every word written by Haekel!! YOU brought him up as a desperate red herring! You are SO transparent! "modern biology does recognize numerous connections between ontogeny and phylogeny, explains them using evolutionary theory without recourse to Haeckel's specific views, and considers them as supporting evidence for that theory."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next