SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bentway who wrote (163170)5/26/2005 7:50:56 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
If the Israelis weren't already there, I'd say they have no right to the land. But they are there, so they do. Yet they continue to steal more land and build walls around it. You seem to condone this. Do you?


If we are using current reality as the guide, why not use current reality, instead of the Green Line?

And you have been told repeatedly that the land used for settlement was almost entirely government owned or owned by Jewish owners from whom it was seized in 1948; it is only "stolen" if one accepts the Pal premise that all of the West Bank and Gaza "belongs" to the future Palestinian state, a premise that Egypt and Jordan certainly didn't support before 1967. Yet, whoops, once Israel had it, the Green Line was sacred and the land belonged to "Palestine". On what principle do you support this idea?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News