Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (117128)	5/30/2005 1:10:10 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 793622

I'm going to stretch a bit here and use the w-word. I think you go to far to say that and it is w-w-w-wrong. <g> Just because they don't see America's interests the same way you do doesn't mean they don't care about them. So why didn't the question come up on Charlie Rose? They may care about America's interests, but they seem to define America's interests chiefly as the good opinion of the rest of Smartland, which is what I think they mean when they wail about how America has sunk in 'international opinion'. The recommendations for improving our standing seem to involve supporting various proto-world government institutions, like the Hague or the ICC or the UN. One really gets the impression that they regard American sovreignty as a dangerous thing that needs muzzling. The maddening thing is that seem just A-OK with the rest of the world, nothing to worry about there. They think that diplomats can end war by treaty. Re Fox: I don't watch any TV much. I don't have cable, it was a waste of money.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next