SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sun Tzu who wrote (163479)6/2/2005 9:16:07 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
After I cited evidence for the majority of suicide bombers being foreigners, and demanded that you come up with some evidence for your assertion that they were NOT foreigners, you did a little shuck-and-jive, changing the subject of discussion from "suicide bombers" to all insurgents, cf

"If there is fighting in Iraq, then the most obvious source of fighters has to be the Iraqis. It is as simple as that."

Nice little switcheroo there. You just changed the grounds of the argument to one that would support your contention that it was Iraqis who were fighting. Your original assertion denying reports that the suicide bombers are not Iraqi, remains as it was before - wholy unsupported by the reports on the ground or any other shred of evidence. Evidence of "dipscrepancies", all ginned up on the spot without even a consistent rationale, are equally specious.

I understand your views all too well. They are designed to change your arguments on the fly, without regard for evidence or consistency.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News