SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Dally who wrote (4801)9/8/1997 9:25:00 AM
From: Arik T.G.   of 94695
 
John,

Better late.

You said on 8/31:
Wouldn't it be fair to use the NASDAQ as a proxy for small caps in '87? Back in '87, MSFT and INTC were still in diapers, the grown-up companies were listed on the NYSE.

The main Q is indeed timing.

It is widely agreed on this and the crash threads that the market is
ridiculously high. Many (including myself) think that the crash is around the corner. Others (Rarebird sounding that view most loudly) claim that this bubble has yet to expand, with small caps taking the
leadership. The argument is that the market cannot fall as long as
the Russell 2000 keeps reaching new highs and/or breadth #s are that good.

Looking at the NASDAQ chart since '87, which, to answer your
(rhetorical?) Q does simulate quite closely today's Russell 2000, It
looked to me that the crash came within just two weeks after NASDAQ new high, but here
home.sprynet.com
I counted 37 trading days seperating between Dow's last new high
and the crash.
My conclusion- new highs in mid/smallcaps do not decrease the
possibility of an impending crash.
A daily record of NASDAQ rates on the three weeks before 9/19/87 would be appreciated.

ATG
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext