SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonder who wrote (31341)6/3/2005 10:26:31 AM
From: PAST  Read Replies (1) of 116555
 
Zonder - Not QED.

Your proof for the following quote: >>Friedman's statement I called demonstrably false is: "Deficits are the only thing that keeps this Congress from spending more".<< has the flaw of narrowness of vision. Friedman's use of the word, "more", has no reference to the past. Your logic only considers a comparison to what was spent in the past, but Friedman made no such reference.

While no doubt exists that Congress has spent more than it did in the past, that does not refute the possibility that Congress COULD have spent MORE than it has at this point, but did not for some reason. Possibly, that reason is because of existing deficits? Your logic has not denied that possibility.

eom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext