SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: The Philosopher6/4/2005 12:41:02 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
This paragraph from an article on plans to drill into the Earth's mantle caught my eye:

Previously undiscovered bacteria that can survive the anticipated 100C temperatures of the upper mantle could be useful on the surface. Heatproof enzymes isolated from bugs brought back by earlier Japanese drill missions are now used in washing powders.

I'm not trying to start a fight here, but am seeking to explore the limits of views. Assuming that scientists had to experiment with and kill many bugs (not a scientific term, but their term) in developing their enzymes, should this be prohibited as a form of animal testing? Of those opposed to animal testing, what sorts of testing on living creatures is opposed and what, if any, is approved?

It's impossible, for example, to test any anti-bacterial without killling millions, if not billions, of bacteria. Is this an okay thing to do?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext