SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : US Health Care System: Prognosis and Cure

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sam Citron who wrote (1)6/4/2005 4:03:24 PM
From: Sam Citron   of 17
 
But note this criticism of McKinnell's ideas:

Little New, Mostly Excuses for High Drug Prices, June 3, 2005
Reviewer: Loyd Eskildson (Phoenix, AZ.) - See all my reviews

McKinnell begins by pointing out that our healthcare system focuses on sickness - containing, avoiding, and shifting the costs of disease. His suggestion (hardly the first one to do so) is that we instead focus on the costs of disease.

To do this, his suggestions include 1)replacing typical health insurance reimbursement with portable "health savings accounts" where those covered would have financial incentives to improve key lifestyle components - eg. exercise, diet, smoking, etc., 2)mandating the use of electronic medication ordering (minimize drug interactions, transcription and dosage errors), 3)"disease management" programs focused on high-expenditure maladies such as diabetes, and take an overall approach to improvement (eg. include lifestyle changes), and 4)specialization of physicians and facilities ("practice makes perfect"). While again, none of these suggestions are new, they are worth repeating.

McKinnell also suggests increasing the supply of healthcare providers - however, the evidence on this is not encouraging - experts have found that a greater concentration of specialists is associated with greater procedure rates - even after taking into account variations in population. He also blames health insurance for the rapid increase in healthcare costs. However, this conclusion is undermined by the fact that despite much lower dental (vs. healthcare) coverage rates, dental costs there have increased MORE than general healthcare costs.

The bulk of the book, however, is devoted to defending the drug industry in general, and Phizer in particular, from charges of overcharging. McKinnell points out that prescription drugs comprised about 10% of healthcare costs 40 years ago and today, that major drug advances have occured in recent decades, and that generic drugs costs LESS in the U.S. than elsewhere. He also defends TV drug ads as helping to improve consume awareness of certain diseases - ignoring the issue of how the information is often seriously biased.

To be fair, however, McKinnell also points out commendable Phizer programs to help African nations and American nations with low incomes to buy drugs. Nonetheless, the overall focus on and bias towards defending drug companies, and the lack of originality (eg. see Leapfrog.org) regarding solutions severely limits the book's value.

amazon.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext