SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Clarke who wrote (118511)6/7/2005 12:57:38 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) of 793917
 
Well, the Dems can't blame conservatives for this....


Patients who use marijuana fear worst if forced to stop


Posted 6/6/2005 11:35 PM Updated 6/6/2005 11:52 PM

By Joan Biskupic, Wendy Koch and John Ritter, USA TODAY

usatoday.com

Relying on a 1942 ruling that permitted government restrictions on local wheat farming, the majority said Congress may regulate purely intrastate activities — such as the personal growing of marijuana — if it finds that failing to regulate them would harm the U.S. government's ability to regulate the commodity.

Stevens was joined in the majority by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.

Dissenting were two conservatives, Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Clarence Thomas, and Sandra Day O'Connor, who is usually at the political center of the divided court. The dissenters said states should have the right to set their own course in dealing with medical marijuana.

O'Connor said the majority was giving the federal government far too much authority. "The government has made no showing in fact that the possession and use of homegrown marijuana for medical purposes, in California or elsewhere, has a substantial effect on interstate commerce," she said.


Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext