SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dale Baker who wrote (468)6/7/2005 3:11:27 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) of 541477
 
The scam just pulled by United is an abuse of the pension guarantee system.

Most private pensions are required under FASB rules to be funded up to the known amount of the liability. The target is to be fully funded. Current rules can be abused,, and were abused during the bubble. The economy was booming, so investments in the pension fund boomed, and contributions required were minimal. The bottom line soared due to the low pension contributions made by publicly traded companies to their defined benefits plans. This fueled the bubble more. Then, someone pricked the bubble.

(If Social Security were subject to the same rules, it would be declared bankrupt.)

Actually, the pensions are generally relatively immune from bankruptcy if I understand correctly. The pension fund is not an asset of the company per se.

After 9/11, special rules were passed by Congress to give companies time to get back to fully funded. Many pensions today are still not compliant with accounting standards of solvency. If companies had prudently kept contributing as if there was no bubble, the "crisis" might have been much smaller.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext