SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (36262)6/9/2005 10:21:23 AM
From: zonder  Read Replies (2) of 90947
 
had Bush done nothing and another incident ensued, he'd also have been criticized.

The alternative to what he has done was never "do nothing". Attacking Afghanistan was fully justified, nobody is arguing about that. Instead of turning the nation's attention AND its major military presence to Iraq, he could have gone after Al-Qaeda with greater force.

I don't see how he had any real choice.

Iraq was not in anybody's mind before the Bush administration started pounding on about what a great threat Saddam was and how he had to be taken out immediately so that US would not glow in the dark. The invasion of Iraq was Bush's choice, not a necessity in any way.

Even if, as you say, he somehow had to invade Iraq - Did he not have the choice of actually listening to those who advised better preparation for the war and its aftermath?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext