Evidence man. Kerry offered nothing, neither will you, nor have you, despite your empty claims standing alone. I'm not kidding anyone. I've read you before, you've failed to provide evidence before, and you'll fail again I do greatly suspect. The swiftees provided damning documents that have never been called into question.
As for Bush, there is testimony he was seen right where he belonged (which if true, wouldn't prove he was always there, would it?). Ahh, but that's not proof to you. Probably this, probably that, is all you offer. And even if you did prove your allegations somehow, I wouldn't care for reasons I've explained and will again in the next paragraph. If he wasn't there, maybe you can prove where else he WAS seen? Not.
Early outs abounded, and you try to have us believe he evaded in his "time to serve." You fail to respond to point after point such as this. Observers see it. Allegations you have, evidence you fail to provide. As for me, I couldn't care less if the man did cocaine, and the same goes for Clinton. I believe in drug legalization, and what are you expecting of me? To worry if Bush used cocaine when I could care less? Want me to be a hypocrite? I also have no reason to look down upon a man who flew far more than required, and like no doubt so many others, probably had an easy time of it at the end of his service time. So what?
Dan B. |
