SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill6/12/2005 4:15:39 AM
  Read Replies (2) of 793883
 
Personal Vidcams on the Battlefield
by James Dunnigan
Strategy Page

As video cameras, and digital storage devices (like the iPod), grow smaller and cheaper, they have become useful as a military intelligence tool. The latest example of this is a lightweight video camera that can be attacked to a helmet, and the video stored on a 30 gigabyte hard drive the size of an iPod. That provides enough storage for 2-46 hours of video (depending on the resolution.)

It was civilian security personnel, former military people, who first started doing this sort of thing. Small vidcams attached to the dashboard, were used to photograph a mission. Reviewing the tapes later would often reveal an attempted attack, or some other danger that needed to be studied, and dealt with in the future. Now a British company, Double Vision (DV), is producing wearable vidcam systems for police, journalists, military personnel and athletes. The DV systems can be worn via a headband type device, with the iPod size storage device stuck in a pocket. The vidcam picks up sound and video, and DV provides cables and software for quickly transferring the material to a computer for editing or viewing. The Double Vision unit also comes with a hand held flat display for checking what is being recorded. This is useful when you want to get specific details. For the most part, though, what you see is what you are getting.

The DV gear costs from $1-2,000, and some troops have already improvised similar gear. Actually, this was first done by an enterprising journalist back in 2003, who got some troops to attach a lipstick vidcam to his helmet, sending the video to a tape recorder attached to the soldiers belt. Some pretty scary, exciting and profane video resulted when the soldier got involved in a firefight.

The U.S. Army actually plans to equip all combat troops with this sort of capability, some time in the future. The idea is to have all these vidcams connected via a battlefield internet, so that an individual soldier can punch a button on his control panel (worn on the forearm), and send what he sees back to headquarters, or just other members of his unit. Having someone running a vidcam during a patrol serves another purpose, a more detailed memory of what was seen and heard. Once back from a patrol, the troops can go through the video and grab material that might be of use to the intel people, or you want to keep for future reference (like the next time you patrol that neighborhood.) The troops take quickly to this sort of thing, and it’s changing the way combat units operate."
strategypage.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext