SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (36416)6/13/2005 3:00:19 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
Laz, we had been dealing with Saddam's BS for a decade before
we first learned that NK had been secretly violating the
agreement with us.

We had been in essentially a shooting war with Saddam for
years in the "no fly zones". In order to protect those whom
Saddam would otherwise slaughter, we already had a
significant presence in & around Iraq.

Every single intelligence agency, including the UN all
believed that Saddam had "stockpiles" of unaccounted for
WMD's, ET AL. Remember, it was a "slam dunk".

The UN, as usual had utterly failed to deal with Saddam, NK,
or any other rouge regime on the planet, leaving us stretched
woefully thin (thanks Clinton) to deal with every pressing
matter.

And there are a number of other strategic reasons why we
needed to deal directly & forcibly with Saddam first. Many
of which I'm sure we will never be privy to.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext