Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (121505)	6/22/2005 3:39:54 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 793725

"We" are not going to have much say in the matter. Maybe this calls for a constitutional amendment. <g> Seriously, I think that part of the reason the judicial system is going in another direction is because the rational for differentiating these guys from civil offenders has not been laid out. They're hiding behind that ambivalence and hoping for the best or that judicial actions will be overtaken by events or some such. I still say that if they have a case they should make it firmly. If they don't, then they should use accepted paradigms no matter the weaknesses. This ambivalent mish-mash will end badly.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next