Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (20579)	6/22/2005 5:43:29 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 28931

"No the two are quite different and you know it. I could quote dozens of posts where you call an unborn Human an "egg" without the qualifiers that you only put in because you were challenged." I have called an egg an egg, a zygote a zygote, a blastocyst a blastocyst, a fetus a fetus, and a child a child. This is simply part of your inability to do other than engage in personal attack and misrepresentation. I really wish you would grow up. Your constant lying is getting more and more tiresome. "If I ever find someone who says they are I will be sure to point them to you, but since I don't and never have argued such it is a complete Straw Man." It is not a straw man. It is part of my argument. DUH! "The zygote is not just another part of the Womans body that can be disposed of as you and TP have argued." The fertilized egg is a part of the woman and is the property of the woman and may be disposed of by the woman. "You did not respond to the fact that the same non person argument was used against Slaves, Woman, Blacks, Jews.... etc etc." So much of your posting is irrelevant crap. I don't recall that particular red herring but there is certainly nothing to respond to. There is no disagreement as to whether woman or blacks are legal persons. The abortion issue has nothing to do with racism or sexism. "Advocate; To speak, plead, or argue in favor of. See Synonyms at support. "I have said repeatedly that I support the RIGHT to abortion." Thanks for Admitting that I do not plead in favor of abortion but rather the RIGHT to abortion. Although it seems unnecessary considering that I have stated so dozens of times. "Obviously they are both" Which is exactly what I have said many many times. "Exactly! The unborn are "other" than the mother in the same respect as a child on her arm is." You know very well that when I referred to "the rights of others" I was NOT referring to a zygote or a fetus. I was referring to legal persons--to citizens with legal rights. "Faulty premise leads inevitably to a false conclusion even if your methodology is impeccable." The faulty premises are all on your side. Thinking an egg should have rights for Pete's sake! "The link is self explanatory. Thanks...but I don't think I will bother with your link. I waste too much of my day dealing with your stupidity and your immaturity.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next