SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bruwin who wrote (21518)6/22/2005 11:21:18 PM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (1) of 78711
 
Your calculation regarding the PEG ratio (PE to earnings growth ratio) is a way to value stocks but of course a dangerous one with high growth stocks. The questions is what earnings growth rate will HANS in the future, not in the past.

My calculation is as follows. I assume that HANS will not be able to expand it's margin's any more (as it did in the past) since it's gross margins have already reached 50%, which is a good value for a beverage company. Subsequently the earnings growth rate will equal the revenue growth rate. I don't think that HANS will be able to grow as it has in the past,and think a forward growth rate of 15% is more reasonable. That by the way is higher than the analyst revenue growth rate estimate of 10% (per yahoo) (for whatever that is worth). From that perspective, HANS does not look cheap. So much depends on what growth you assume going forward, which is always a wild bet, IMO.

Incidentally, HANS is a stock i studied 2 years ago - i found it via a low price to book screen. Trading at around 4$, i put in a lowball bid, which never came to pass. Oh wey! The stock looked cheap but not a screaming buy back then, growth and earnings were fairly anemic and it's stock were way below the anyones radar screen. Could have, should have...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext