SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.32+0.4%2:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougSF30 who wrote (162428)6/27/2005 12:14:54 AM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (3) of 275872
 
FX-57 review hardocp.com

Conclusions

And the Winner is…

Why did we not take the time to compare an Intel CPU in our comparison? The simple fact of the matter is that while Intel would have you believe that they do make "gaming" processors, the AMD Athlon FX-57 simply kicks the crap out of anything Intel makes in the realm of gaming. We also figured that anyone that considers themselves a hardcore gamer in this market is very likely already using an Athlon 64 CPU and that is the reason we supplied you with the 3200+ scores. We were hoping to give you a good basis of what sort of power an upgrade from that class of CPU might give you. All of this is not to say that Intel does not make Pentium 4 and Pentium Extreme Edition processors that are capable of gaming. Most new processors today have more than enough power for the casual gamer, but in the super high end gaming realm, Intel does not currently compete.

Back to the subject at hand though. The AMD Athlon FX-57 shines brightest in a sea of over-marketed gaming products. The AMD Athlon FX-57 has marketing bark and the gaming bite to back it up. Actually more like gaming “chomp” as the FX-57 just obliterated the scores previously held by its predecessor, the FX-55. If you want the best gaming computer in the world, it had better have an AMD Athlon FX-57 inside.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext