SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mishedlo who wrote (34519)6/28/2005 8:43:24 AM
From: Wyätt GwyönRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
It also affects property taxes but then again refis at lower interest rates helped. In states like CA, it did not affect property taxes at all.

so, you pretend that real inflation in taxes doesn't exist just because of a stupid law in California. but they are simply passing the buck: somebody has to pay for tax increases. so, if it's not RE taxes, then it's income taxes, or bracket creep, or higher debt. these things are inflation by any other name.

following your logic, there is actually more inflation in Texas real estate than in California. my TX house is up maybe 60% in the last decade, whereas my property taxes are up 100%. by contrast, a similar CA property might be up 200-300% while the taxes are up 15%. but, according to you, TX has the higher rate of inflation, even though my state income taxes are still zero in TX, while CA the state is more indebted and the CA house guy is paying more due to the aforementioned factors. but these factors are not "inflation" by your definition.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext