SPRL - Strat Petroleum, Ltd. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SPRL - Strat Petroleum, Ltd.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bid Buster who wrote (787)	7/1/2005 3:55:52 PM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (3) of 1072

true.....although I dont see how tasr is responsible for cops tasr'ing a poor friendly dog..especially since cops went to wrong house...except that they continue to push their weapons as 'non-lethal'. in my mind, they are liable for marketing something as non-lethal, when it is not a 100% surefire 'non-lethal weapon. Too many experts have attributed deaths to the use of tasr....and many say they are safe...always 2 sides to a coin, but imo, the best thing tasr could is admitt they are possibly lethal, let them be regulated and sales will take off and they dont have to worry about liabilities anymore...nobody sues smith and wesson when somebody is killed by one of their weapons...it would be the same for tasr, imo. them sticking to this 'non-lethal' issue is hurting them badly, imo....

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next