SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jttmab who wrote (51586)7/4/2005 2:39:33 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
There may be some real good that comes from the SC decision. If state and local governments either prevent or make more difficult future decisions to seize or condemn or otherwise damage private property, we could end up with MORE protection rather than less.

It's a difficult issue though. I can also see the side of the government (I think Ben Franklin thought this) which wants to prevent vast chunks of land being owned by a handful of people. We don't see this that often but way back when in England and in the US they must have.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News