SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: geode00 who wrote (51607)7/4/2005 3:11:47 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
If state and local governments either prevent or make more difficult future decisions to seize or condemn or otherwise damage private property, we could end up with MORE protection rather than less.

As everything I've read so far indicates that States are celebrating the decision I don't think their inclined to put more restrictions in.

DeLay is futzing around with some legislation to deny Federal funding, but that's just a back handed way of interfering with State's rights. Flip a coin as to whether that's constitutional. But I expect the initiative will effectively result in no one following up in the States.

This is mostly a downtown/inner city issue. Not a big constituency.

jttmab
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News