SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
CSCO 77.58-0.2%11:26 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (68219)7/5/2005 2:35:09 PM
From: pfalk  Read Replies (1) of 77400
 
You are absolutely correct about wind not being able to meet all our electricity demands, but the situation isn't quite so bleak.

By your own numbers, the consumption is something like 2 million times more than we can get from one wind turbine.

However - in Alta Mont Pass in California, alone there are about 5000 turbines. All we "need" is 500 "Alta Mont's" spread over the US.

That's still unrealistic, but we shouldn't forget that we still have hydroelectric power plants. If you add solar power in those areas where we have the greatest need for air conditioning (delivers peak output when your cooling demands are the highest) then you can see that while this can't solve all of our needs, it could, indeed, solve a *significant* part of the problem. Something like 20% - 25% of our total demand, and upwards of 50% of our peak demand (because wind and solar delivers the most in the hot afternoons, when air-conditioning demands peak).

P.S. I vote to keep mindmeld too!

P
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext