SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Gamblers--can you make a living?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (26)7/6/2005 1:23:32 AM
From: Mark Marcellus  Read Replies (1) of 113
 
Actually, it is 16 to 4 --regardless of the decks

Oops, guess I shouldn't be posting in the morning. Maybe I'll make more sense late at night. My caveat about the decks was correct, though trivial. For example, in a single deck game where the dealer shows a 10, it would be 15 to 4, assuming no other hands show 10, of course. This ratio would obviously also change as the deck is played out, but 15 to 4 is your starting point. The more decks you add, the closer it gets to 16 to 4.

Would you double against an ace when you have 11 and the dealer has no blackjack?

Yes. Haven't worked out the odds. I'm an occasional player, so I'm happy enough with the charts that others have worked out, and the consensus seems to be to double. Would be interested in hearing a counter argument - it's probably another very close call.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext