SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation
DJT 13.87+1.5%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: James Calladine who wrote (26620)7/7/2005 9:03:15 AM
From: cirrus  Read Replies (1) of 362362
 
Gonzalez was arguing a case for his client. Lawyers do that every day. It doesn't mean he would follow that line of reasoning as a judge.

And lets remember... after 9/11 just about everyone in America would have been in favor of far more torture than the Gonzalez guidelines allowed if such torture prevented further terror attacks. I'm not arguing in favor of torture, but there is a difference between mixing up someone's sleep routine and applying electrical prods to their privates. If it weren't for the Gonzalez guidelines what would the rules be?

Defense attorneys argue for clients they know to be guilty but act from a different perspective when they become judges. That's the way the system works. It's better to look at Gonzalez's rulings from the bench to get insight to his thinking. Some of those rulings have ticked off the right wing, so he's obviously not in their pocket.

Your assumption that Gonzalez will be a mouthpiece for Bush/Cheney is just that, an assumption... he might well happen... but I can think of a number of other far worse candidates who are guaranteed to be mouthpieces for the religious right.

You folks are OK with the architect of torture policies on the Supreme Court........?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext