Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (20880)	7/8/2005 1:51:43 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 28931

"I think you are trying to make every logical blunder in the book..." I don't know what you are talking about. There is no logical fallacy in voled in drawing attention to the parallel between the Dred Scott decision and your position that the unborn are not Legal persons and therefore do not have rights. The court ruled that blacks were not legal persons (they had no rights) they were "property" and could be treated as the owner saw fit. Your position as I understand it is that the the child who is three inches away from being born is not a legal person, they are the womans property and can be killed or disposed of for any reason the owner sees fit. The question is clear But I understand why you refuse to answer it. Would lynching a black man be wrong if He was your property and it were legal to do it? As far as not being able to tell the difference between a child and a parasite as if three inches makes any meaningful difference; You have got to be kidding. That's why the killer/Dr. must be careful not to let the child slip out before they kill it. That is nothing but a legal technicality that lets them get away with murder.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next