Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill who wrote (37672)	7/8/2005 1:46:03 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) of 90947

Not true. I abhor torture. Let's look at your scenario. I have an easier one but it is the same problem. My daughter is in a locked room, sleeping. The building is on fire. A man blocks my path to the door where my daughter is sleeping. He is not attacking me. He is only a threat to my daughter because he wont move his butt. I give him a choice, allow me to pass and save my daughter or I violently remove you from my path so that I can save my daughter. There is no torture, he gives me what I want or he suffers and I am justified in the defense of my daughter. It is pretty well understood that persons who engage in torture to gain information do not always know what they are looking for which is a far different idea. The same with the man who has my daughter buried alive. In either event I may not have what it takes to remove the barrier but I have the right to engage the man who blocks me. He is an active mortal threat to my daughter, not a subdued (surrendered) prisoner. In either case, I have no intention to cause pain and suffering to someone who has surrendered his fight against me and is posing no threat.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next