SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (52190)7/11/2005 5:52:50 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
"1) I don't think..."
This much is apparent.

Now...about this:
"Now that Rove has essentially been caught red-handed peddling this information, all of a sudden you have respect for the sanctity of the criminal investigation?"

That was part of the transcript. Like I said, it's not my job to help you with your comprehension disability but I'll give you a clue.

Soon AFTER the investigation began, scottie made multiple remarks as to rove's involvement...essentially that rove was NOT involved.

He IS involved and NOW scottie won't comment saying the reason for "no comment" is because of the investigation.
With that question the reporter is pointing out that it looks quite bad that scottie NOW chooses not to comment...using the investigation as the reason....when he had no similar compunction due to an investigation about prior comments when he could attempt to say rove was not involved.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News