SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Doug R who wrote (52199)7/11/2005 6:30:20 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) of 173976
 
"I never had a doubt that have an opinion about Rove and that you knew what the transcript means."

THAT makes no sense.
(you left out a word in your haste to continue obfuscation.)

It would probably help if I break it down into short sentences. Since you noticed I left out the word 'you' then your lack of comprehension must be do to the length of the sentence.

1) You have an opinion about Rove.
2) I don't doubt that you have an opinion about Rove.
3) You know what the transcript means.
4) I don't doubt that you know what the transcript means.
5) The article is evidence to you that Scott is colluding with Rove et al.

What I contributed was my opinion.
1) I doubt that Rove can be convicted of a crime.
2) The American people will not like it if it appears that he is lying, or covering up.
3) Either way this episode is fuel for unending conspiracy theories.

The meaning of my contribution is that if the American people are left with a feeling of distrust they will judge Rove more harshly than if he actually intended harm to Plame. The worst harm is that she become unable to perform undercover work which she wasn't doing anyway.

It also is obvious to me that even though Plame is probably of little or no concern for most of you wingers, you see this as a way to cut some political hay. If the American people pick up on that, your mock outrage will produce an even bigger yawn than a yelling Gore.

In addition to that, it is obvious to me that you have tried and convicted Rove beyond a shadow of doubt in your own mind. You are convinced that he has committed a heinous crime and you seem frustrated that I wont validate that point of view. Is that correct?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News