”I see no reason not to presume that you would also support the killing of older disabled children if it were also legal to do so and you could get some moron judge to proclaim them unworthy of same legal status of their "betters".”
You don’t need to presume when I have stated repeatedly that I do not support murder or the Right to murder. But you just continue to play your games like a toddler! After all, the judge is NOT your better and YOU the moron--RIGHT!! YOU think it is the other way around! And because you can neither think, spell, nor argue…you do not acknowledge your betters! What arrogance coming from a ZERO!
”Partial birth abortion is never medically necessary!”
By September 2004, all three courts (San Francisco, New York and Nebraska) found the Bush Ban Unconstitutional because it did not include a health exemption and because medical testimony was incontrovertible that medical exemptions for health reasons was necessary. Judge Kopf: "the overwhelming weight of the trial evidence proves that the banned procedure is safe and medically necessary in order to preserve the health of women under certain circumstances”
But, of course, the Judge is a “Moron” and is not one of your “betters”!
”Nothing about the child changes except the location”
Don’t be an idiot. Have you missed the entire discussion??
”OK technically is an irrelevant non sequitur. A sick and morally bankrupt one at that! You wouldn't recognize a circular position if it came around and bit you on the ass”
Again—don’t be an idiot. It was NOT a “non sequitur”. It was my answer to your question of where I would draw the line. The answer was: "that is between a woman and her doctor".
It is NOT circular and (NO, greg or e) it is NOT a “non sequitur”—LOL!
Instead of the ad hominems, why don't you try (for a change) to make an argument? When a doctor approves a PBA for a valid medical reason, then you are speaking nonsense to say it is not a valid medical reason--unless you a medically qualified to speak to the issue of medical validity.
The reasoned position at which a creature with human DNA becomes a LEGAL PERSON is at the point which it has inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This ensues upon separation from the mother. It does not yet have the capacity to exercise rights, but it is nevertheless a self assumed duty of society to defend the incapable. Even though we allow millions to die each year from inability…the passion to assist is still alive and active in the human conscience. |
