Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 249.66

+7.6%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (165176)	7/13/2005 10:20:15 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (5) of 275872

Tim In order to fall under the definition of the word evidence, it doesn't have to be admissible in court. I suppose what Madame Olga's spirit guides tell her is evidence too but that's not admissible in Court either, while testimony from the CEOs of the companies named would certainly be admissible in Court. Perhaps you see no distinction but I do. What I meant was in regards to what we require personally to be convinced that something is true. I would not be convinced by any claims or accusations AMD makes, I require greater proof. We already have one of the parties named by AMD coming forwards saying, in essence, AMD is full of it. All we have heard is AMD's spin. This is not sufficient to persuade me, but it is clearly all that is needed to sway virtually everybody else on this board. Why? Because they have no interest in finding the facts, they have already convicted Intel in their own minds. It's pretty hard to reason with people who can be convinced without facts because their minds can't be changed with facts either. As I said, I have a difference standard.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next