SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation
DJT 14.79+4.7%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tonto who wrote (28359)7/15/2005 10:00:19 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) of 362490
 
Yup. Revealing classified information is against the law even if it's already been revealed. The law is simple. You don't have to be a Republican or Democrat to know it. Here's a copy of The Espionage Act of 1917. thirdworldtraveler.com

And, of course, he is guilty of perjury in his sworn statements to the FBI. Lying isn't against the law in public, though it should be reason for dismissal from his position, and he certainly lied about not knowing Plame's name.

I realize the Republicrooks will try to spin the law. They always do, as in Watergate and Iran/Contra. As a criminal conspiracy of a party, they have no choice.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News