SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Carragher who wrote (125354)7/15/2005 10:52:54 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 793841
 
If his wife wasn't undercover.. which she wasn't , she was attending opening cia meetings etc and no attempt was made to have her undercover by reporting to some obscure company in order hide her identity. rather cia was doing nothing to cover up her as working for cia.


I'm listening to an NPR panel on Rove now. They said, based on one of Plames former CIA supervisors, that Plame was still on the CIA books as undercover, even though she hadn't worked at all undercover for over 6 years, and she was working a desk job at Langley under her own name, so many, many people knew she was CIA and none of them would have supposed that she was undercover, since she was not hiding her employer. One of the authors of the law about blowing an operative's cover said that Plame was not covered by it - it was meant to cover real undercover agents overseas or briefly on rotation back home. When Novak told the CIA that he was going to publish her name, they yawned.

This is part of the CIA's war against the White House.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News