SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (1681)7/15/2005 6:23:41 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 541941
 
Building bases in Saudi Arabia was bad advice.

No, under the circumstances it was good advice. We needed the bases to support "The Gulf War", and if we were not going to drive on to Bagdhad to take out Saddam having the basis in north east Said (far away from Mecca and Medina) made sense.

When we used Kuwait to stage the 2nd war, we took up practically half of Kuwait. For the months precdeding an invasion that might have been acceptable, for an indefinite period of time after the 1st war it probably would not have been.

It became too obvious that the bases were close to the oil fields, and not in defense of another move by Iraq.

That statement doesn't make any sense. The oil fields are something we would want to defend if Iraq made another move. Also the bases where located near Iraq, as is a lot of the oil. Furthermore a number of the bases already existed before the US sent any forces in. They were pre-existing Saudi bases, some of which we expanded, some of which didn't even really need expanding. For that matter even if it was some sinister plot to grab Saudi oil, we wouldn't have needed major bases near the oil. Not to mention the fact that we neved did make any attempt to seize control of the oil.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext