SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (1666)7/15/2005 6:39:26 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) of 542256
 
Sex offender? I don't think so. Who accused him in court of any of the following (legitimately, in a court of law)?

Rape (IC 35-42-4-1)

Criminal Deviate Conduct (IC 35-42-4-2)

Child Molesting (IC 35-42-4-3)

Child Exploitation (IC 35-42-4-4b)

Vicarious Sexual Gratification (IC 35-42-4-5)

Child Solicitation (IC 35-42-4-6)

Child Seduction (IC 35-42-4-7)

Sexual Misconduct with a Minor as a Class A, B, or C felony (IC 35-42-4-9)

Incest (IC 35-46-1-3)

Sexual Battery (IC 35-42-4-8)

Kidnapping, if the victim is less than 18 (IC 35-42-3-2) or

Criminal Confinement, if the victim is less than 18 (IC 35-42-3-3);

Wishful thinking and innuendo don't count. What have you got in terms of firm evidence- presented to a trier of fact? You have nothing. "Accusations" without a trial and a trier of fact are meaningless- look what Bush has been accused of- do you want to accept all accusations? Or just the ones which fit your political slant? Almost everyone seems believable when they get to present their point of view unopposed, without cross examination under threat of perjury. Dem or Rep, accusations without any way to vet them are just so much blather. A little responsibility with regard to "accusations" would go a long way, imo.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext