SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 249.66+7.6%Jan 21 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (165772)7/16/2005 1:39:35 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (3) of 275872
 
Petz

Do you honestly think this SHOULD be legal?

I'm not the person to answer that question, and neither are you. I don't have the background and neither do you.

If those 2 things actually took place then you can be quite certain that Intel's team of anti-trust lawyers thought it was legal when they instructed Intel how to structure their contracts. How people here can be so dumb as to think Intel acted in a vacuum is beyond me. The contracts were structured by the best legal experts in the business.

You remind me of a losing Football team arguing about a certain formation in the middle of the game. The leading team was told it was legal but you are arguing if it should be legal. You want the game stopped and points awarded to you so the game will be "fair". If you don't get at least a 30% Score Segment Share then you're sure the other team is cheating. I think you will find out that the "formation" was perfectly legal and like it or not Intel played by the rules. If the rules turn out to be unfair in the true sense of the word then let Congress change the rules, but not retroactively.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext