SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 253.73+1.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Phud who wrote (165217)7/18/2005 3:06:32 PM
From: inexRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Ephud,

My understanding in AMD's lawsuit is that, like most civil suits, there only has to be overwhelming evidence of Intel's actions. AMD does not have to prove its case without doubt. The fact that some journalists, (Mike Magee of The Inquirer...theinquirer.net is one example that I can immediately think of...) have reported similar findings PRIOR to AMD's suit lend credence to AMD's claims. I'm sure that the reason most on this board accept AMD's claims as true is because we have followed AMD for quite some time and have heard most of the allegations in a more general manner (i.e. "one OEM who refuses to be named claims..."). It surprises me that with the JFTC investigation complete (certainly no evidence there???) you would feel that there is "no evidence". Certainly Intel "disagreed" with the JFTC's findings, and, this is why AMD announced its suit in Japan as well (IMO). By forcing Intel into litigation where there would be a monetary settlement, Intel can no longer say "we disagreed with the JFTC's findings but, don't think that the resolution will change our ability to conduct business as usual..." This sounds as though it just wasn't worth Intel's while to pursue its innocence. If/When Intel has to fork over $50M, this will be taken as definitive proof of Intel's guilt in Japan... AMD will then be able to take the results of this litigation into its U.S. case and be able to say that Intel was found guilty even after Intel tried to defend itself...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext