Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elroy who wrote (242101)	7/19/2005 9:45:04 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) of 1576159

The information in question is not news for public dissemination. In fact, it's the opposite. It's a secret that the public is not supposed to know. I agree with this, although the consequence of revealing the source would/could have a chilling effect on future whistle blowing. I wonder if Ms. Miller's secret source informed her that upon receiving the "confidential information" that she was quite possibility participating in the violation of federal law? I don't think she was breaking the law for just hearing the name, unless she passed it on. She is in prison for refusing to testify before the grand jury and reveal the name(s) of her source. I have a feeling that the prosecutor is trying to build a case against more than one person, and Miller's testimony may be critical in nailing them (Novak for example?) Al

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next