SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy who wrote (242320)7/20/2005 8:21:54 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (2) of 1577651
 
RE: "Answer the question! What's the sexual split of the potential Supreme Court candidates?"

I already did. Within the pool, there are a substantial number of female candidates. This isn't the UK where there are no female judges. Our system is surprisingly packed full of them.

RE: "It's not the size of the pool that YOU have issue with, its the difference between the sexual split of the candidates and the split of the court."

You need to reread what I said: "It's statistically out of whack. The pool of candidates is sufficiently large enough."

You asked about the pool of women candidates and that's what the above answers. The pool of FEMALE candidates is very large. Are you that out of touch? This isn't the UK you know.

RE: " Supreme Court justices to weight demographics is one of your platforms"

Yes, but that proves how much I prefer diversity - even if an opinion is against me. Why else do you think I read this thread - the diversity of opinion is interesting.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News