SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bruwin who wrote (21721)7/20/2005 3:41:58 PM
From: bruwin  Read Replies (1) of 78661
 
"bruwin - read and learn what some of the posters say.
your multiple-aliases didn't go over to well and your self-promotion didn't help either.
there are a lot of intelligent-professional investors on this site.
try to learn a bit before you post attacks against some fine individuals."

That’s the message I found in my mail from "m ----".
I’ll refrain, this time, from mentioning a name. As a matter of interest, I searched all the Boards in this Forum of "Value Investing" and could find no other reference to that individual. It seems "aliases" is not an uncommon occurrence.
As I’m not able to reply in private, I’m "going public" in this regard.
Now I intend making this the last reference to this rather boring topic.
First and last, the puerile and misguided references to "multiple-aliases" and "self-promotion" don’t, in my opinion, warrant any further discussion. I’ve dealt with them.
I certainly agree that there are "intelligent-professional investors on this site". I wouldn’t partake if one couldn’t have meaningful discussions with other investors who see Fundamental Analysis as very relevant to stock market investment.
However, that doesn’t mean that I have to agree with everything they, or anyone else, says. I certainly don’t expect others to slavishly agree with my views. In my opinion, it’s the quality of what one bases one’s analysis on, and not on how fine the individual may, or may not, be.
I fail to see how my comments on stocks can be defined as "attacks... on individuals". To the best of my knowledge, this is a public forum. If I wish to express an opinion, I’ll express it. I trust everyone else will as well. I more than welcome constructive debate and discussion on anything I may say. If folk are not prepared to adopt that approach and don’t like what I say, ... "Tough". Don’t read it, just ignore it.
What I’m not prepared to accept, as I made clear to dale baker, is to have someone make derogatory remarks when they know little, or nothing, about me.
"m ----" has no idea how long I’ve been involved in the stock market. Rest assured, I didn’t enter it yesterday or the day before. "m ----" also knows very little, if anything, about my stock market investment strategy. In fact, its primarily not mine, but originated from my friend and colleague Dr. Karl Posel D.Sc. Ph.D., who put his 30 years experience in the stock market, together with his intimate knowledge of Financial Statements, and their important relevance to company analysis, into several books on stock market investing. Professionals and academics such as Dr. Posel value their reputation, and as such, are very circumspect about putting anything into print which they cannot defend and substantiate. To the best of my knowledge, no one has found fault with any of his published works.
And finally, I’m always vigilant about learning more about investing. Who can say that they know all there is to know ?! What I don’t need is a smart third party making snide and unwarranted remarks in that regard.
Q.E.D.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext