i have the least bit of interest in 'letting survivors and their relatives have a chance' i told you, the time for bs is long gone. it is simple. either we KILL them (and i mean KILL THEM ALL), or they KILL US (and they DO mean to kill us ALL)
OK, I've persevered, but I can't get past this. Are you actually arguing that in retribution for the London bombings, or perhaps to prevent 'them' doing it again, the US wipe out the entire population of Yorkshire [the bit of the UK where the bombers all lived], maybe with a few nuclear bombs, or simply round up all the Muslims there and kill them?
The first seems a bit harsh, given we are nominally your allies and all that. And I can't help feeling that the second would probably not meet acceptance either; something about the image of, say, surrounding the entire county with barbed wire to prevent escapees, then interrogating the population and - what, shooting anyone a little bit brown? or only those who actually admit they're Muslim? - well, it's not really very British, to say the least.
Or are you actually proposing that we (well, you) exterminate the entire Muslim umma, all billion or so of them?
Wow. Even Hitler never managed quite that peak of anti-Semitism, and it's not often anyone could use him as an example of thinking small with the deranged bigoted genocide plans. |
