SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Carragher who wrote (127181)7/24/2005 9:40:45 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (2) of 793958
 
At the point of observation at the residence, he could have just been heading to the local 7-11 for a pack of smokes. Observation leading to the train station added add'l points of suspicion.

Which brings us back to ... he evaded questioning in a tense environment, at a period of time during intense circumstances. He made that uncooperative choice. If they stopped him at the 7-11, or at the house, or at the train station, do you think his choice would have been different?

A. Don't evade the police at this time if questioned outside the house.
B. Flee for the train if we're near the station.
C. If at 7-11, flip a coin for further instruction.

I don't think this was his thought matrix, and I do think if the cops had it to over again, they should do it the same way, given the heightened circumstances.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News