Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 13.77

-3.8%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SiouxPal who wrote (30102)	7/25/2005 2:30:52 PM
From: tsigprofit	Read Replies (2) of 361898

Not perfect - far from it. Wrong? Well - It is an opinion only - and I still hold it. It may be OUT THERE, but a lot of people hold the same opinion I think. Tom Tancredo, the National Review writer, and me. Who would have 'thunk it?? I have thought it out carefully, and still stand by it. Realize for me though - this is ONLY to be used as a response to a massive attack on the USA - much larger than 9-11. I truly hope we never see that happen, and never have to respond in that way. But - we must leave options on the table. If we don't - why spend 10 Trillion on the military since 1950? Why not hang it up now - and say we won't respond with nuclear weapons - even if nuked ourselves? But - we won't do that. Always has been our policy to respond. We might not hit holy sites - but believe me we would hit a portfolio of Arab capital cities at the least - and should if attacked. JMO - not facts, just my opinion. We can agree to disagree on this one SP :-) t >> I think TSIG was wrong. I also think he can realize that. None here are perfect.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next