Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 13.90

+1.7%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (30196)	7/25/2005 7:09:22 PM
From: tsigprofit	Read Replies (1) of 362347

I was not pleased either when the bombs fell on Baghdad. I cursed it, and told people Bush was a war criminal - because Iraq did not do 9-11 or attack us. Now - I was also someone who would not have objected if we had used a nuke on Kabul after 9-11. And tactical nukes on all of the mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan, where Bin Laden was hiding - irradiating the entire measure for good luck. That's where I came down on it then - and I'm not sure doing that then wouldn't have been better than what we did in Iraq. We would have gotten the majority of them - including Bin Laden, and not occupied Iraq as we've done. It is possible to be both against Iraq, and for a severe response after 9-11. >> I was not "pleased" when the bombs hit Baghdad. I fought so hard against the war (and the lies) that I felt the tragedy very deeply. I still can't believe we couldn't stop the madness ...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next